07 February 2008

Sales Genie: a Lead on Racist Superbowl Ads

The Superbowl is the one time of year when I actually look forward to the commercials. While there were a few good spots, this year's crop of million dollar ads didn't blow me away. At least not in a good way. A few commercials, however, distinguished themselves with varying doses of good old fashioned racist stereotyping. Let's start with Sales Genie.

Sales Genie sells information. Sales leads, to be exact. That's right, they provide consumer information to the telemarketers. Next time your land line rings during dinner, and it's that guy from the Sears Credit Protection Plan you've been dying to hear from, you may well have Sales Genie to thank.

According to their site, they can provide info on 210million consumers, covering 95% of US households. We're not just talking phone numbers, either, oh no -- Sales Genie is so much more than that. For a fee, they will provide all manner of interesting nuggets on these US consumers (that's you and me), such as income, home value, age, gender, years at residence, ethnicity, bankruptcy status, and more.

That's right folks, they even offer instruction on accessing "sensitive data", such as ethnicity or whether there are children in the home. They also inform you that even though consumer calls must be within the federal "Do Not Call" guidelines, you may still request that your sales leads include those "Do Not Call" numbers, simply by checking a box. Don't ask, don't tell, y'all!



So that's who they are. Let's see how they advertised their services during the most coveted of all TV timeslots:





See, this is where diversity in hiring pays off. Did no one on their marketing team step forward and say, "You know ... this might not play so well, boss"? Really? Who did those accents? I'm surprised they didn't go with straw hats and protruding teeth, à la Abercrombie and Fitch. Jeff Bercovici of Porfolio magazine, reports that the spokesperson for OCA, an Asian-Pacific Americans advocacy group had this to say:

We found it really racist. We'll be discussing how to respond once we have everybody in the office, but some of our members have already been contacting us. It was really offensive.


Of course, many people disagree. I love when White folks get to decide that something isn't racist. Here are some of the more common justifications floating around on The Internets:

Panda bears are Chinese, so panda bears in cartoons would have a Chinese accent.

Yes, I'm serious. I saw this comment not just once, but several times.

1) Panda bears are animals, therefore, they do not speak.

2) An animal indigenous to a certain region of the world does not take on the characteristics of humans who are indigenous to that part of the world. (There is the exception of Paris Hilton's dog wearing pink dresses, but that's involuntary on the part of the dog.)

3) The "accent" in this ad is ridiculous. It is nothing more than an anthropomorphic attempt to disguise a stereotypical caricature of an accent as an actual accent. It's demeaning.

----------

What about the Kangaroo with the Australian accent, huh? Huh? Nobody's bitching about him. You're the racist!

In American culture, some accents are viewed as "good", while others are viewed as "bad". The list of desirable accents includes French, British, South African, Australian, Swedish (especially on hot tall blonde females), and the like. German too, though folks seem to prefer the way French rolls off the tongue. People with these accents are often assumed to be sexy, smart, cultured, worldly, and/or interesting. They are also often assumed to be White.

Accents on the undesirable list include any variety of Asian accent, Indian (as in from India), and Spanish accents -- unless actually from Spain. This list also includes Black folks who sound "too ethnic", Native peoples, and some Southerners, even though these aren't "foreign" languages. People on the undesirable accent list are often assumed to be ignorant, lazy, stupid, disruptive, sneaky, primitive, poor, uncultured, criminals, or any combination of the above. They are also, with the exception of Southerners, assumed to be people of color. Interesting how that shakes out.

So advertising a shampoo or some insurance with an Australian-sounding lizard or 'roo has a whole different connotation than some pandas whose stereotypical accents smack of the Chinaman caricatures in old movies. The pandas in this spot are portrayed as not the sharpest quadripeds in the jungle, buffoons to laugh at, whereas the lizard (you know who I'm talking about) makes you want to go buy insurance and take him up on that offer of crumpets.

---------

What about the psychic panda? She didn't have an accent at all! The characters were diverse! You're the racist!

Slow down, Maynard. The psychic panda did have an accent -- most likely it is very similar to your accent, thus you consider it "the norm". Beyond that, the psychic panda character is portrayed as the smart one, the rescuer. She's the one who shows the ignorant "Chinese pandas" the error of their ways and offers a solution. It's no coincidence she's the one portrayed with a generic White American accent, or, as you say, no accent at all. The hope is that viewers will also follow the sage advice of the psychic panda, and have a good laugh at the unfortunate Ching-Ching and Ling-Ling while they're at it.


:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Moving on. Here is Sales Genie's other spot. This time the stars of the show are a very large family from India, obviously immigrants. Dad's boss is an Ebenezer Scrooge - Larry Tate hybrid.


Pretty much more of the same. Bad accents, stereotypical features (did you catch the wife's unibrow?), obsequious brown employee, powerful White boss. And what's that employee doing having all those kids if he can't even support them? Golly, Biff, good thing he called Sales Genie, or our tax dollars would be paying to keep all those kids in curry and saris!

Of course, many people had no problem with this one either:

I've seen so many Indian families with large numbers of kids. That's not racist, it's just reality. If it was a big White family, I wouldn't be offended. You're the racist!

I know you are, but what am I?

OK, you're right -- most likely you wouldn't feel offended if it were a large White family in the ad. And why should you? Having too many kids that you can't support is not an attribute generally applied to White people as a race. Because White folks are seen as individuals, whereas if an Indian (Mexican, Black...) family "has too many kids", it's seen as a racial trait or tendency. They've likely had to represent their race as well as themselves their whole lives. Can you see how they may feel offended where you would not? Had it been a large White family in the spot, you wouldn't have applied that to yourself in any way at all, because you probably don't even think of yourself in racial terms, you're just "the norm".


-----------

You people are too sensitive. I have a friend from India, and he told us at work he thought it was funny. Lighten up! If it's ok with him, it should be ok with you.

1) Your friend is an individual. The fact that he personally doesn't find the commercial offensive does not translate into this commercial not being offensive to any Indian people.

2) People outside the dominant culture often feel pressure to go along with jokes aimed at their particular demographic. It's a way of separating themselves from that demographic in order to be seen as an individual, and aligning themselves with the dominant culture in order to avoid being labeled "too sensitive". It may also earn them the vaunted status of "one of the good ones". (I'm betting if he'd said it was racist, your Indian friend would suddenly not be so quotable.)

3) Just because it's ok with your friend, doesn't mean it has to be ok with me. He is not the spokesman for Indian people, or anyone else. He only speaks for himself.


::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Whew. There were 2 other ads that fell along the same lines. First, Bud Light's Immigrant commercial:




Sigh. See above.

And the Black immigrant with the chicken? Are you kidding me? If someone says that's not a stereotype denoting primitive rituals, I'll scream. Again, the immigrants are portrayed as bumbling grinning idiots. Even the one who gets the White girl in the end is shown to be so stereotypical that it's seen as a joke rather than a possiblity. White men can remain secure in the knowledge that the funny little immigrant man poses no real threat.


:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

OK. Here's the last one.




Hola!

That's all I've got.

26 comments:

sageweb said...

When I saw the Panda add right away the room full of people I was in said "That was Racist".
We rolled our eyes at the bud light and the other sales genie add, but no one said straight out they thought they were racist. But you have opened my eyes..I will give you that. I agree with you. I know this topic is on race but it is also on the superbowl adds and there was one commercial that was talked about on a (gay)talk radio show yesterday along with the panda. It was the one with Richard Simmons in it..the driver sees him and pushes on the gas pedal. Now there was a big debate on this. When I saw this Sunday along with the pandas I thought oh shit...I bet people will bring this up...which is good. Some people think it was a slight move to "run down" the gay. Some people thought well Richard isn't out,so what? One way or another it was borderline...if it made me think right at the moment I saw it then it was something that should have been thought out better. You made some great points and I wish you would have called in to the radio show I was listening too. (one debater yesterday told us to replace Richard Simmons with Bush...we all agreed that was okay)

Sling said...

My ex-brother-in law is Hispanic,and doesn't speak Spanish..
I remember watching a movie with him one time,and an Hispanic man gave his dog a command in Spanish.
My BIL said,"Yeah..like the dog can speak Spanish!"
..Yeah Carlos,..everyone knows dogs only speak English..
I have no real point.

Red Seven said...

See? This is why I don't watch the Super Bowl!!

Okay, not really.

But your analysis is spot-on; so much so that I have really nothing to add, except ... "Amen, non-sexual crush."

Kimberly Ann said...

Great post. I didn't see the game so I missed these gems. Wow, that panda ad is so bad, I can't imagine that it got the green light - except, everybody is talking about it. Which is just what they want. Good or bad, the company is now a household name. Pretty rotten to use a racist ad as an intentional poke in the eye, but I'd be surprised if they didn't know exactly what they were doing.

Red Seven said...

Kimberly Ann: Exactly. As stupid as they might seem to those of us who value inclusivity and difference, these folks know *exactly* what they're doing. They have products to sell, and in order to sell anything, one must make one's potential customers feel that they're "understood." Unfortunately, one way to accomplish this is to validate their biases -- and by the time they've finished laughing at the stupid minority caricatures, they feel so superior that they barely notice that they're being "sold."

yellowdoggranny said...

wow,you are spot on...i saw the indian one and thought oh, man that's so racist..but im more sick of the advertizing people thinking i will buy something if it's sold to me by a lizard with a english/aussie accent, or some british nanny type running around jerking peoples shirts off and selling cleaning supplies...jeez..

The Witty Mulatto said...

Yeah. What a sleazy company. I hope the negative reaction gets them shut down...but sadly, it probably won't.

RG said...

You know what demographic they're promoting their products, are you surprised?

Willym said...

You're spot on with this one - is this a new trend in American advertising or is it just as RG says: the demographic for this particular slot encourages this sort of crap?

Traveling Matt said...

you should see the original cuts of the sales genie commercials. i saw them on cracked.com. wow.

more cowbell said...

Sorry it took me a while to get back to you all, most likely because earlier I was downtown ... listening to Barack Obama. whoo-hoo! More on that later.

Sageweb: Yes, when he gunned the motor, I was taken aback, but when he ended up driving around Richard, I confess I didn't really get that they were trying to portray him purposely speeding up until I saw it the 2nd time. Then I did wonder what the heck was that about, but couldn't really get a feel one way or the other, mostly on account of how a lot of people are just plain annoyed by Richard, regardless. So I dont' know, but it did occur to me too.

Sling: Well, according to the Panda ad, the dog would speak whatever human language is spoken in his land of origin. With a bad accent. Sheesh.

Red: Please. You didn't watch the game because you had cheap tix to the theatah. Smooch.

KA: You lost me at "I didn't see the game". Yes, I"m thinking, this was so blatant, there's no way they couldn't have known. Then again, though it's publicity, seems the complaints would not be a good thing, and I can't imagine they wouldn't lose business over this.

Red: That is a really good point; gotta be some truth to that scenario. If so, they'd best be taking a closer look at their own demographics data ... the times they are a changin', Sales Genie.

YDG: So ... I got taken when I bought that closet full of shampoo? Crap. That kangaroo's hair was so shiny and bouncy...

WM: I don't know about shut down ... but companies are experiencing more backlash for the blatant crap. Just ask Abercrombie & Fitch.

RG: -sigh- Not surprised, just disgusted. Well, maybe a little surprised that they'd take that risk at such huge prices.

more cowbell said...

Willym: Who knows -- the fact that there were FOUR of these spots in one superbowl ... yeah, kind of looking like a trend, eh? And that particular demographic is probably yukking it up over at youtube as I type.

Monica: Seriously? You mean they were worse? Do you have a link? I'm off to the Googles...

Anonymous said...

"What about the psychic panda? She didn't have an accent at all! The characters were diverse! You're the racist"

Right. Because "diversity" and "inclusion" is a central trait among the enlightened Panda community. Psycho Panda didn't have an accent because she was speaking in tongues.

Honestly, these comments are as bad as Bush saying that all Latin Americans speak Latin.

Nicole Bradshaw said...

As a Southerner, I am interested in how you established your list of what accents are considered "good" and "bad" in America. Is this just based on your own observations of what's prevalent in the media? If so, your assessment itself is a generalization, which seems to be what you are railing against . . . ?

While I agree that many with Southern accents are depicted as stupid/lazy, there are also many films and other forms of media that show Southerners as the actual rounded characters they are, which defies your theory. KWIM?

more cowbell said...

Al -- Or as bad as him referring to people from Pakistan as "Pakis". Our leader ... first in foolery.


Nicole -- Welcome! Yes, exactly - it is a generalization. You're right, Southerners are often depicted in a more flattering and realistic light. Often their accent or heritage is not even an issue -- that is true, though, with any of the accents listed. There are good, bad, and neutral depictions of all.

My point was not that every person sees Southerners in a negative light, but rather to point out the tendency in this country to equate negative attributes to certain accents, and positive attributes to others. Had this been a post specifically about Southern accents, I would have differentiated between the different types of Southern accents, and the disparity in how they may be stereotyped. There is a very different reaction to an accent seen as "refined, genteel, Southern belle", than the reaction given to what's crudely termed "the NASCAR crowd". (That term is itself an example of the negative stereotyping) Both are inaccurate stereotypes, but one carries a more positive vibe than the other.

I think the whole language hierarchy thing is jut another method humans use to classify each other, usually to one group's benefit. When I lived in Hungary, certain Hungarian accents were considered "better" or "worse", unbeknownst to us, as Americans. My kids' language instructor admonished them not to develop the "Kaposvari accent", as it sounded "less educated", but to instead strive for the Budapesti accent. However, the Hungarians couldn't really differentiate between Texas or Boston accents, or between Australian and British. When I lived in Germany, there was "high German" and "low German", and don't even get me started on how East Germans were perceived after the wall came down. British friends have told me there is definitely an accent hierarchy there.

Anyway, I do believe that Southerners, as many other groups, have unfairly had to deal with negative generalizations about them. It was not my intent to imply that ALL portrayals are negative or that ALL people hold those opinions. Thanks for adding your thoughts to the discussion.

Middle Child said...

Dogs are all different colours ... all that matters to them is to be fed, patted and who's got the sharpest teeth...

When I talk about my red Kelpie am I being racist to the dog? Shit maybe the thought police are on to me already.

All this shit we are so concerned about these days... the masters must be laughing their guts out at us while they steal our farms and businesses and corner stores...


all this racist bizzo these days is like dragging a red herring accross the path of whats really important...whoops a red herring... sorry herrings
sorry sorry sorry

but do I really mean sorry or am I just saying what they want me to say?

Elizabeth said...

When I saw the "Indian" Sales Genie add, I noticed immediately that the cartoon style was very 50s, Hanna Barbera, retro. The 50s graphic style is very hot right now, which makes sense when you look at the wider social picture. Right now we're in a serious economic, political, moral, and geopolitical decline. It seems predictable that people would look back longingly to a time - the 50s - when "we" (that "we" which obviously excluded so many Americans) were in ascendance (vs. decline). It feels to me like the racial hierarchies and stereotypes we're seeing in these ads are part of that messed up package of social insecurity. What quicker way to make yourself feel big than making someone else seem small?

Nicole Bradshaw: My entire family is Southern (except me. I was raised, as my grandmother said, "a yankee.") so I have some credibility here, I hope. My mother recounts instances of being treated as stupid just because she had a drawl. She ended up working hard to lose her accent, just to avoid those kinds of assumptions. I think it's beginning to fade a bit now, but certainly for my parents' generation, Southern accent = parochial and dumb. And when I went to an Ivy League East coast college, people gave a Southern classmate of mine all kinds of grief to her face for how she talked. So I do think the prejudices and and assumptions, stupid as they are, still hold.

Anonymous said...

middle child,

While all dogs may be different colors and have a universal, collective need to be patted, the American Eskimo with the pedigree at the local Petsmart is going to be patted significantly more than the Terrier crossed with the god knows what mongrel who is in residence at the pound. And when each has an accident on the new owners Persian rug, the Eskimo will no doubt be "just learning", where the mongrel is going to be labeled a "not housebroken" dirty mutt.

But, I guess those are probably poor examples since I think (though I could be wrong) that the point of this post was people, who, in my opinion, tend to be a lot more complex and nuanced than dogs.

more cowbell said...

Middle Child: If we only had it so simple as the dogs, right? They know what's important. Human beings seem to love focusing on things that divide us, usually in an attempt by one group or another to come out on top -- yeah, meaning some other group gets shoved down.

I see what you're saying: "all this racist bizzo these days is like dragging a red herring accross the path of whats really important... You're right, it IS ridiculous; more divisions for people to hate each other over. Unfortunately, only the groups up at the top have the luxury of ignoring it. As a white person, I have the option of saying, "Hey, this racist crap is a waste of time and energy, I'm going to be above this petty shit and focus on more important things." It could work for me, but my kids, who are not white, will never have that option, because they live in a racist society where other people focus on it whether they like it or not. Maybe someday humans will have evolved to the point where racism isn't an issue, but we're not even close right now.

Now where are my puppy dogs...

Elizabeth: Great point about the 50s advertising style being representative of a more stable, prosperous time! And great point as well that racism was a big part of that time. What quicker way to make yourself feel big than making someone else seem small?
Amen. That's really the upshot of any of the isms ... one group climbs up by pushing another down.

As far as your comments on the Southern thing, I am not a Southerner, but have lived in the South. As a non-Southerner, I've been privy to the comments others make about Southerners when they think it's acceptable -- much the same as White folks making racial jokes/comments if there are no people of color around. In fact, I think particularly with this latest presidency, it's been almost more acceptable to disparage those with a Southern twang. People openly joke about Bush's perceived stupidity in a way that clearly links his intelligence with being Texan. They openly mock his accent. If he were from New York, Oregon or Cali, would they do that? I doubt it. When I did live in the South, friends told me that those stereotypes were very hurtful and offensive, and they often felt resentful at having to "disprove" the stereotypes.

Al: Hmm, interesting point. I guess there is truth to that. THere's a certain reaction people give when they find out that Batman isn't a purebred Lab -- almost like they're disappointed in him! (Screw them. I'm personally a big fan of the Labradog.)

But yeah, I'm of the mind that humans are way more complex and we find far too many ways to divide and classify ourselves. Maybe we should take a lesson from our canine friends, eh? They seem to have the right idea.

Anonymous said...

Humans are idiots.
Yes. That is a generalization.
But as a human, I feel I can say that and get away with it.

more cowbell said...

Hat: Bwa-ha-ha-ha.

whimsical brainpan said...

These commercials are made to appeal to mindless morons. And I don't care how my saying that makes me sound.

Anonymous said...

Late to your party, but am always glad to make it here. SPOT fucking ON. Thank you for a wonderful essay, and the response were good as well. Al made be giggle.

more cowbell said...

Whim: Bwa-ha-ha x2. And somebody got paid big coin for dreaming up that spot.

Tater: Thanks! It's not a true party until you get here anyway.

Craig D said...

Have we learned NOTHING from those Geico caveman commercials?

PBS is currently running quite a few excellent programs in honor of black history month. And there are no bone-head commercials.

Now, where's that remote..?

more cowbell said...

Craig: What? What's an excellent program without the bonehead commercials? What's the world coming to?